This morning started out with a morning of Young Eagles flights. I got to see Buck’s Maule M-4 for the first time. He flew 8 of the 31 kids, which was pretty amazing considering that he only had 2 seats. He said that the max gross weight is 2300 and the useful load is about 800 pounds. He has the same engine that we will use, though we probably won’t have the same Hartzell CS prop. His airplane is certainly beautiful, and I can’t wait to finish ours since it will be a very capable young eagle hauling machine. For now I just helped out with the paperwork and logisitics.
In the last entry I was starting to install the right side brake pedals when I realized that I was going to need to relocate some tools from the clubhouse. I loaded up my home-made work bench and took it over to the hangar, complete with an assortment of tools that I will hopefully not need in the clubhouse as much as I will need in the hangar. I had to file the attach side of the pedals a little bit so that they would fit between the attach tabs.
I started to mount them but realized that I didn’t have the right bolts. I have several little boxes of bolts but was surprised that none of them were the right length! Actually, I did have several that were the right length, but they were not drilled. Since the brake pedals and cylinders are subject to rotation, 43.13 states that they must not be secured with self-locking nuts- that means a drilled bolt with a cotter key. Since I knew that I was at least going to need those bolts, I figured I might as well go through the rest of the airplane and see what else I will need. Shipping from the aircraft hardware stores generally isn’t free or even cheap.
I also started to notice that some of the bolts that I had were already comitted to parts and assemblies that were temporarily removed from the airplane. For instance, the bolts that hold the flight control cables onto the control horns were not on the airplane, but were presumably in some of those little boxes of bolts. I made a sweep of about half of the fuselage, adding missing hardware as a way to mark it as “reserved.” In the process, I also saw some hardware that was not installed the way that I would have installed it, so I also resolved those minor conflicts. For instance, the rudder stop bolts weren’t really quite long enough to stick through the nylon lock nut, so I switched them out.
This was the case in several areas, and I also saw a few “subject to rotation” applications that I would have prefered to use with castle nuts and cotter keys.
I worked for 3 hours today and made notes of which hardware I was definitely going to need, which included a few small pieces, and a few big ones, like the engine mount bolts. I was somewhat surprised to see that I didn’t have any of those, since I figured that they would have been part of the Wicks hardware kit. So, I went to the Wicks hardware list to look and see if they were originally included. There on the list are some AN6-46 bolts, which are about the right length and in the right quantity (5). So either the wicks list has changed, I have the bolts somewhere else, or I don’t have them. I repeated this same process a couple of other times, referencing the Aircraft Spruce catalog for the grip length of each AN bolt, measuring what the grip length needed to be, and sorting through drawers to try and find the right stuff. All the while I was making a list of things to buy so that I can make one order and get most of what I need.
I have several bolts that are the right size but undrilled, so I might try and find a bolt drilling jig. For example, I have enough -6 bolts for the landing gear that I will probably not need anywhere else.
I also noticed that on the plans Bob calls for a pulley as AN210-3A, which is equivalent to MS24566-3A. Yet, the wicks kit included only -3B pulleys instead of the -3A’s listed on the plans. So far I haven’t resolved this discrepancy. The Aircraft Spruce catalog says that the -a and -b pulleys are the same dimensions but have a different type of bearing in the center. I suspect that they are interchangable but will probably have to call Bob or someone else to figure that out for sure. The funny thing is that in a case like this I picture an attorney questioning a witness. “Why didn’t you use the pulley specified in the plans?” Maybe that’s an idea for the next episode of Law and Order. I know it’s terrible to think of it that way, but that is the image that comes to mind in this case, and also quite often at work.
Some folks say that building airplanes isn’t as hard as people make it out to be. This is quite likely true, and an experienced airplane builder can certainly separate